Tuesday, April 13, 2004

Eee, Be-deeeh, That's All Folks!

This is the first time I've watched a formal Bush press conference (transcript)....which I don't feel so guilty about since he's only given 8 in his entire presidency (3 if you only count the ones on prime-time television). At this point into their terms, Eisenhower had given 83 conferences and Clinton had given 40.

Of course, we know why Bush doesn't do press conferences. But before forgiving him for his inability to articulate, we shouldn't forget that press conferences aren't just opportunities for reporters to showcase: they are the closest thing we have to a public forum with the president. As opposed to carefully coordinated election stops, press conferences are (or rather could be) a time for an elected leader to be put on the spot for his failures. Sadly, the conferences are increasingly scripted especially for this president. When asked a question by Time Magazine's John Dickerson, the president fumbled through, "I wish you'd have given me this written question ahead of time so I could plan for it...You just put me under the spot here, and maybe I'm not as quick on my feet as I should be...."

At least he didn't look at his reporters list too much.

But in a surprising end, Don Gonyea of NPR got the last question and asked a particularly critical one: "You deliver a lot of speeches, and a lot of them contain similar phrases and they vary very little from one to the next....Have you failed in any way to really make the case [for the war with Iraq] to the American public?"

On a separate note, USA Today says that John Negroponte is likely to be selected as the US "ambassador" to Iraq. As an ambassador during the Reagan administration, Negroponte was allegedly complicit in human rights abuses commited by the Salvadoran Contras and the dictatorship in Honduras.


Saturday, April 10, 2004

The Idol Masses

"Unlike the general public, which would probably be capable of trimming a list of candidates down to a serviceable pop singer by the end of a season, the People are systematically ruining it for everyone. The People must be stopped."

This critique of American Idol sounds vaguely fitting as a critique of American democracy: a small rabid group of "People" with a disproportionate amount of power; leaders chosen because they are untalented and therefore more like the voter; all of which result in the general public getting turned off by the whole show.

The People are "ruining it" by clogging up the phone lines as they furiously vote multiple times for their favorite. Of course, in a political voting system, you can't vote more than once. You can however often find ways to give as much money as you want. Perhaps American Idol is an example of why we should limit that money?